Make.com workflow repair

Repair the automation you already paid to build.

Fixed-scope audits and targeted repairs for Make scenarios that are partially built, unreliable, or quietly damaging good data.

Async-firstEvidence-ledNo unnecessary rebuild
Scenario healthAudit mode

Highest-risk finding

Source precedence is implicit
High

Blueprint reviewed

Failure reproduced

Repair scope defined

Built around the tools already in your stack

Make.comAirtableGoogle SheetsGmail & DriveAPIs & webhooksAI extraction

Reliability before complexity

Fix the failure pattern, not just the red error bubble.

I work inside the scenario you already have and make the smallest defensible repair.

01

Duplicate records

Search-before-create logic, stable match keys, and idempotent reruns that do not multiply data.

02

Good data gets overwritten

Source-of-truth rules and null-safe updates that stop later documents from clearing trusted fields.

03

Scenarios fail silently

Targeted error handling, retry paths, alerts, and logs that make failures visible and recoverable.

04

The workflow is hard to change

Clear routers, filters, iterators, aggregators, JSON mappings, and a written handoff for the next edit.

Start with evidence

A paid audit before a bigger commitment.

The first engagement is deliberately bounded. You get a useful diagnosis and repair order even if we do not continue into implementation.

  • The likely root cause and exact failure point
  • A prioritized repair plan, not a generic rebuild proposal
  • Data-integrity and reliability risks
  • Acceptance tests and a fixed implementation scope

A clear path forward

From unreliable to testable in three steps.

01

Send a redacted brief

Share the apps involved, the failing step, expected versus actual behavior, and a redacted blueprint or error bundle.

02

Receive a fixed-scope audit

I trace the existing scenario, test the highest-risk assumptions, and document findings in priority order.

03

Choose the next step

Keep the audit, implement the repair yourself, or apply the audit fee toward an agreed repair engagement.

Data safety boundary

Redacted samples are enough to start.

Never send passwords, API keys, live credentials, or unredacted customer data. A blueprint, failed execution bundle, and synthetic or redacted sample are the preferred starting point.

Ready when the workflow is not

Bring the failure. Leave with a repair plan.

Send a short project brief

Include the apps, failing step, expected result, actual result, and one redacted artifact.

Contact WorkflowRescue Remote · Async-first · Written handoff